linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET 0/8] perf annotate: Make annotation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWN5Jwsf5dxqw0BJxpdu89FM54A-AtQpEqxeE7XLDx3mA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2023 12:14:23 -0800
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/8] perf annotate: Make annotation_options global (v1)

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:52 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:50:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 09:59:02AM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:46 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:37 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > > Sgtm. My point wasn't to criticize, I think this is a good change, I
> > > > > was just trying to imagine doing things in a way that could overall
> > > > > reduce complexity
> >
> > > > Yep, thanks for your review.  Can I get your ACKs? :)
> >
> > > For the series:
> > > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> >
> > Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next.
>
>
> Now trying to fix this:
>
>   CC      bench/numa.o
>   CC      tests/hists_cumulate.o
> ui/gtk/annotate.c: In function ‘symbol__gtk_annotate’:
> ui/gtk/annotate.c:179:43: error: passing argument 3 of ‘symbol__annotate’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>   179 |         err = symbol__annotate(ms, evsel, options, NULL);
>       |                                           ^~~~~~~
>       |                                           |
>       |                                           struct annotation_options *
> In file included from ui/gtk/annotate.c:5:
> /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/util/annotate.h:376:36: note: expected ‘struct arch **’ but argument is of type ‘struct annotation_options *’
>   376 |                      struct arch **parch);
>       |                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> ui/gtk/annotate.c:179:15: error: too many arguments to function ‘symbol__annotate’
>   179 |         err = symbol__annotate(ms, evsel, options, NULL);
>       |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/util/annotate.h:374:5: note: declared here
>   374 | int symbol__annotate(struct map_symbol *ms,
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>   CC      tests/python-use.o
>   CC      trace/beauty/sockaddr.o
>   CC      arch/x86/util/topdown.o
> make[6]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/build/Makefile.build:105: ui/gtk/annotate.o] Error 1
> make[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>   CC      arch/x86/util/machine.o

Maybe a signal to remove the gtk support :-)

Ian