linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 07/15] net: dsa: mt7530: do not run mt7530_setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231207200132.772h3t3l6coan6ht@skbuf>
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2023 22:01:32 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>,
        mithat.guner@...ont.com, erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 07/15] net: dsa: mt7530: do not run
 mt7530_setup_port5() if port 5 is disabled

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 08:40:15PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Also, reducing the indentation level of for_each_child_of_node() by one
> can't be bad. Maybe even by more. There's this pattern:
> 
> for_each_child_of_node(dn, mac_np) {
> 	// do stuff with mac_np
> 	break;
> }
> 
> aka we only care about the first child of dn. We could find the mac_np
> as the only operation inside for_each_child_of_node(), break directly,
> and "do stuff with mac_np" could be done outside, further reducing the
> indentation by 1 level.

I noticed just now that there is further filtering on the child OF node
by of_device_is_compatible(). In that case, of_get_compatible_child()
could be used to eliminate for_each_child_of_node() completely.