linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/13] scsi: ufs: qcom: Remove unused ufs_qcom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ca4ag4xrnw3cegbfqjcjf4ejidi2oblabcrkxadpgv6yda26a4@2khffdooqvlj>
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2023 07:46:17 -0600
From:   Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     martin.petersen@...cle.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_cang@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] scsi: ufs: qcom: Remove unused ufs_qcom_hosts
 struct array

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:01:59AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:54:43PM -0600, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 08:44:15PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > ufs_qcom_hosts array is assigned, but not used anywhere. So let's remove
> > > it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 5 -----
> > >  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > > index a86f6620abc8..824c006be093 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > > @@ -90,8 +90,6 @@ static const struct __ufs_qcom_bw_table {
> > >  	[MODE_MAX][0][0]		    = { 7643136,	307200 },
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > -static struct ufs_qcom_host *ufs_qcom_hosts[MAX_UFS_QCOM_HOSTS];
> > > -
> > 
> > I think we can get rid of MAX_UFS_QCOM_HOSTS as well with this change in
> > place?
> > 
> 
> Yes, thanks for spotting.

With that in place please add:

    Reviewed-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>

> 
> - Mani
> 
> > >  static void ufs_qcom_get_default_testbus_cfg(struct ufs_qcom_host *host);
> > >  static int ufs_qcom_set_core_clk_ctrl(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool is_scale_up);
> > >  
> > > @@ -1192,9 +1190,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > >  
> > >  	ufs_qcom_setup_clocks(hba, true, POST_CHANGE);
> > >  
> > > -	if (hba->dev->id < MAX_UFS_QCOM_HOSTS)
> > > -		ufs_qcom_hosts[hba->dev->id] = host;
> > > -
> > >  	ufs_qcom_get_default_testbus_cfg(host);
> > >  	err = ufs_qcom_testbus_config(host);
> > >  	if (err)
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
>