lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 08 Dec 2023 16:41:11 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     James Tai <james.tai@...ltek.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        James Tai <james.tai@...ltek.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] irqchip: Introduce RTD1619B support using the
 Realtek common interrupt controller driver

On Wed, Nov 29 2023 at 13:43, James Tai wrote:
> +static int realtek_intc_rtd1619b_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct realtek_intc_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	const struct realtek_intc_info *info = data->info;
> +
> +	data->saved_en = readl(data->base + info->scpu_int_en_offset);
> +
> +	writel(DISABLE_INTC, data->base + info->scpu_int_en_offset);
> +	writel(CLEAN_INTC_STATUS, data->base + info->umsk_isr_offset);
> +	writel(CLEAN_INTC_STATUS, data->base + info->isr_offset);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int realtek_intc_rtd1619b_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct realtek_intc_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	const struct realtek_intc_info *info = data->info;
> +
> +	writel(CLEAN_INTC_STATUS, data->base + info->umsk_isr_offset);
> +	writel(CLEAN_INTC_STATUS, data->base + info->isr_offset);
> +	writel(data->saved_en, data->base + info->scpu_int_en_offset);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops realtek_intc_rtd1619b_pm_ops = {
> +	.suspend_noirq = realtek_intc_rtd1619b_suspend,
> +	.resume_noirq  = realtek_intc_rtd1619b_resume,
> +};

So this is the 4th copy of the same code, really? Why is this not part
of the common code?

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ