[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lea4czki.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 19:35:25 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ELF: supply userspace with available page shifts
(AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK)
* Kees Cook:
> I significantly prefer APIs not being arch-specific, so I'd prefer we
> always include AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK. For an architecture that doesn't
> define its own ARCH_AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK, it's not _inaccurate_ to report
> 1 << PAGE_SHIFT, but it might be incomplete.
The downside is that as an application programmer, I have to go and
chase for the information the legacy way if I encounter
getauxval(AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK) == getpagesize() for a longer time
because the interface does not signal the absence of any extended
page sizes.
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists