[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202312081037.895E558@keescook>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 10:38:07 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ELF: supply userspace with available page shifts
(AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK)
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 07:35:25PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kees Cook:
>
> > I significantly prefer APIs not being arch-specific, so I'd prefer we
> > always include AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK. For an architecture that doesn't
> > define its own ARCH_AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK, it's not _inaccurate_ to report
> > 1 << PAGE_SHIFT, but it might be incomplete.
>
> The downside is that as an application programmer, I have to go and
> chase for the information the legacy way if I encounter
> getauxval(AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK) == getpagesize() for a longer time
> because the interface does not signal the absence of any extended
> page sizes.
Are there architectures besides x86 where AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK isn't a
single bit? If so, let's get them added now along with x86.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists