linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 14/33] kmsan: Support SLAB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 14:51:51 +0100
From:   Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To:     Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/33] kmsan: Support SLAB_POISON

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:02 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Avoid false KMSAN negatives with SLUB_DEBUG by allowing
> kmsan_slab_free() to poison the freed memory, and by preventing
> init_object() from unpoisoning new allocations. The usage of
> memset_no_sanitize_memory() does not degrade the generated code
> quality.
>
> There are two alternatives to this approach. First, init_object()
> can be marked with __no_sanitize_memory. This annotation should be used
> with great care, because it drops all instrumentation from the
> function, and any shadow writes will be lost. Even though this is not a
> concern with the current init_object() implementation, this may change
> in the future.
>
> Second, kmsan_poison_memory() calls may be added after memset() calls.
> The downside is that init_object() is called from
> free_debug_processing(), in which case poisoning will erase the
> distinction between simply uninitialized memory and UAF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  mm/kmsan/hooks.c |  2 +-
>  mm/slub.c        | 10 ++++++----
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kmsan/hooks.c b/mm/kmsan/hooks.c
> index 7b5814412e9f..7a30274b893c 100644
> --- a/mm/kmsan/hooks.c
> +++ b/mm/kmsan/hooks.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ void kmsan_slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
>                 return;
>
>         /* RCU slabs could be legally used after free within the RCU period */
> -       if (unlikely(s->flags & (SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU | SLAB_POISON)))
> +       if (unlikely(s->flags & SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU))
>                 return;
>         /*
>          * If there's a constructor, freed memory must remain in the same state
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 63d281dfacdb..169e5f645ea8 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1030,7 +1030,8 @@ static void init_object(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object, u8 val)
>         unsigned int poison_size = s->object_size;
>
>         if (s->flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE) {
> -               memset(p - s->red_left_pad, val, s->red_left_pad);
> +               memset_no_sanitize_memory(p - s->red_left_pad, val,

As I wrote in patch 13/33, let's try to use __memset() here (with a
comment that we want to preserve the previously poisoned memory)