linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/Kconfig: rust: Patchable function Rust compat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72=393A++eb8W2eQz+Su83xhZDVcr-T3WKZ63Toxvy_i1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:09:32 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
Cc:     Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
        Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
        Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/Kconfig: rust: Patchable function Rust compat

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:23 PM Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
<yakoyoku@...il.com> wrote:
>
> About issues, commits or PRs I was referring to issues in
> `rust-lang/rust`. When we use unstable compiler features in R4L they
> get tracked in [1].
>
> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/355 [1]

Almost right :) In that one we put compiler things that we "want",
i.e. they may not even implemented in upstream Rust. When we start
using them (or we intend to use it and they have a
flag/feature/cfg...) it is when we (also) put them in the "main" list
of unstable features in issue #2.

Cheers,
Miguel