[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXnbGbjm-i7n4qU3@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:26:01 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alex Vinarskis <alex.vinarskis@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: Fix the fractional clock divider
flags
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 04:18:54PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 04:13:52PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Dec 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > > > tmp = clk_register_fractional_divider(NULL, name, __clk_get_name(tmp),
> > > > + 0, lpss->priv, 1, 15, 16, 15,
> > > > CLK_FRAC_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO_PS,
> > > > - lpss->priv, 1, 15, 16, 15, 0,
> > > > NULL);
> > >
> > > What an ugly interface. Intel-only too, right?
> >
> > Nope, de facto way how custom clocks are being introduced.
> > See clk-provider.h for several similar APIs (that require an
> > additional, custom, flags to be supplied).
>
> This call only has 2 call-sites, both Intel.
Yes, but the clock fractional divider is used wider.
And again, it's not related to Intel, as this how clock framework
does the custom clocks. I don't know how to say this clearer.
Whatever, thank you for review and applying this fix!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists