[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6579db46.5d0a0220.d624a.80b4@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:26:43 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
David Epping <david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v6 3/3] net: phy: add support for PHY package
MMD read/write
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 04:13:28PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 04:55:08PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 03:47:19PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:57:30AM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > > Some PHY in PHY package may require to read/write MMD regs to correctly
> > > > configure the PHY package.
> > > >
> > > > Add support for these additional required function in both lock and no
> > > > lock variant.
> > > >
> > > > It's assumed that the entire PHY package is either C22 or C45. We use
> > > > C22 or C45 way of writing/reading to mmd regs based on the passed phydev
> > > > whether it's C22 or C45.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> > >
> > > I don't recall what has been said in previous postings of this, but
> > > introducing new helpers without an example user is normally frowned
> > > upon. The lack of cover message for this three patch series also
> > > doesn't help (the cover message could explain why there's no users
> > > being proposed with this addition of helpers.)
> > >
> >
> > These are prereq for the qca803x PHY driver and the PHY package series.
> >
> > I can move this single patch in those series, but it was suggested to
> > move these simple change to a separate patch to lower the patch number
> > since they were orthogonal to the PHY package series proposal.
>
> ... so adding a cover message (your series in general seem to lack
> those) would be a good idea to explain that.
>
I tend to use cover letters only for big series, sorry for not being
very clear about this. Soo should I detach this from here or it O.K.?
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists