linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: cdev: relocate debounce_period_us from struct gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:27:11 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: cdev: relocate debounce_period_us from
 struct gpio_desc

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:15:10AM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 04:40:12PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 3:27 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > +out_unlock:
> > > > > +   spin_unlock(&supinfo.lock);
> > > >
> > > > No use of cleanup.h?
> > >
> > > Again, that is new to me, so no not yet.
> >
> > Yep, please use a guard, they're awesome. :)
> 
> Before I go nuts and switch everything over, is it ok to put a return
> within the scoped_guard - it will automatically unlock on the way out?

Yes, should do that.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko