[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6960ef41-fe22-4297-adc7-c85264288b6d@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:59:26 -0800
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
To: Michael Weiß <michael.weiss@...ec.fraunhofer.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@...alicyn.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
gyroidos@...ec.fraunhofer.de,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] bpf: cgroup: Introduce helper
cgroup_bpf_current_enabled()
On 12/13/23 6:38 AM, Michael Weiß wrote:
> This helper can be used to check if a cgroup-bpf specific program is
> active for the current task.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Weiß <michael.weiss@...ec.fraunhofer.de>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 2 ++
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> index a789266feac3..7cb49bde09ff 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> @@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
> return array != &bpf_empty_prog_array.hdr;
> }
>
> +bool cgroup_bpf_current_enabled(enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type type);
> +
> /* Wrappers for __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb() guarded by cgroup_bpf_enabled. */
> #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS(sk, skb) \
> ({ \
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index 491d20038cbe..9007165abe8c 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,20 @@
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_ARRAY_FALSE(cgroup_bpf_enabled_key, MAX_CGROUP_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(cgroup_bpf_enabled_key);
>
> +bool cgroup_bpf_current_enabled(enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type type)
> +{
> + struct cgroup *cgrp;
> + struct bpf_prog_array *array;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + cgrp = task_dfl_cgroup(current);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + array = rcu_access_pointer(cgrp->bpf.effective[type]);
This seems wrong here. The cgrp could become invalid once leaving
rcu critical section.
> + return array != &bpf_empty_prog_array.hdr;
I guess you need include 'array' usage as well in the rcu cs.
So overall should look like:
rcu_read_lock();
cgrp = task_dfl_cgroup(current);
array = rcu_access_pointer(cgrp->bpf.effective[type]);
bpf_prog_exists = array != &bpf_empty_prog_array.hdr;
rcu_read_unlock();
return bpf_prog_exists;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cgroup_bpf_current_enabled);
> +
> /* __always_inline is necessary to prevent indirect call through run_prog
> * function pointer.
> */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists