[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXnjXuLXl4mfVUJC@google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:01:18 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86/intr: Explicitly check NMI from guest to
eliminate false positives
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, Like Xu wrote:
>
>
> On 13/12/2023 3:28 pm, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> > Hi Like,
> >
> > On 12/5/23 19:20, Like Xu wrote:
> > > From: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
> > >
> > > Explicitly checking the source of external interrupt is indeed NMI and not
> > > other types in the kvm_arch_pmi_in_guest(), which prevents perf-kvm false
> > > positive samples generated in perf/core NMI mode after vm-exit but before
> > > kvm_before_interrupt() from being incorrectly labelled as guest samples:
> >
> > About the before kvm_before_interrupt() ...
> >
> > >
> > > # test: perf-record + cpu-cycles:HP (which collects host-only precise samples)
> > > # Symbol Overhead sys usr guest sys guest usr
> > > # ....................................... ........ ........ ........ ......... .........
> > > #
> > > # Before:
> > > [g] entry_SYSCALL_64 24.63% 0.00% 0.00% 24.63% 0.00%
> > > [g] syscall_return_via_sysret 23.23% 0.00% 0.00% 23.23% 0.00%
> > > [g] files_lookup_fd_raw 6.35% 0.00% 0.00% 6.35% 0.00%
> > > # After:
> > > [k] perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context 57.23% 57.23% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
> > > [k] __vmx_vcpu_run 4.09% 4.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
> > > [k] vmx_update_host_rsp 3.17% 3.17% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
> > >
> > > In the above case, perf records the samples labelled '[g]', the RIPs behind
> > > the weird samples are actually being queried by perf_instruction_pointer()
> > > after determining whether it's in GUEST state or not, and here's the issue:
> > >
> > > If vm-exit is caused by a non-NMI interrupt (such as hrtimer_interrupt) and
> > > at least one PMU counter is enabled on host, the kvm_arch_pmi_in_guest()
> > > will remain true (KVM_HANDLING_IRQ is set) until kvm_before_interrupt().
> >
> > ... and here.
> >
> > Would you mind helping why kvm_arch_pmi_in_guest() remains true before
> > *kvm_before_interrupt()*.
> >
> > According to the source code, the vcpu->arch.handling_intr_from_guest
> > is set to non-zero only at kvm_before_interrupt(), and cleared at
> > kvm_after_interrupt().
> >
> > Or would you mean kvm_after_interrupt()?
>
> Oops, it should refer to kvm_after_interrupt() as the code fixed. Thank you.
No need for another version if that's the only hiccup, I can fixup when applying.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists