linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 02/26] x86/fpu/xstate: Refine CET user xstate bit enabling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:01:35 -0800
From:   "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To:     "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <dave.hansen@...el.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        <seanjc@...gle.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <chao.gao@...el.com>,
        <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, <john.allen@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/26] x86/fpu/xstate: Refine CET user xstate bit
 enabling

On 12/13/2023 1:30 AM, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
> 
> Let me involve Chang, the author of the code in question.
> 
> Hi, Chang,
> In commit 70c3f1671b0c ("x86/fpu/xstate: Prepare XSAVE feature table for 
> gaps in state component numbers"),
> you modified the loop as below:
>          for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(xsave_cpuid_features); i++) {
> -               if (!boot_cpu_has(xsave_cpuid_features[i]))
> +               unsigned short cid = xsave_cpuid_features[i];
> +
> +               /* Careful: X86_FEATURE_FPU is 0! */
> +               if ((i != XFEATURE_FP && !cid) || !boot_cpu_has(cid))
>                          fpu_kernel_cfg.max_features &= ~BIT_ULL(i);
>          }
> 
> IMHO the change resulted functional change of the loop, i.e., before 
> that only it only clears the bits without CPUIDs,
> but after the change, the side-effect of the loop will clear the bits of 
> blank entries ( where xsave_cpuid_features[i] == 0 )
> since the loop hits (i != XFEATURE_FP && !cid), is it intended or 
> something else?

The code was considered as much *simpler* than the other [1]. Yes, it 
clears those not listed in the table but they were either non-existed or 
disabled at that moment.

Thanks,
Chang

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87y2eha576.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/