lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXsxc8953uAfizLv@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2023 18:46:43 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] gpiolib: cdev: relocate debounce_period_us from
 struct gpio_desc


On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:08:05PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:56:37PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

...

> While I think of it, what tree should I be basing on?
> These patches are based on v6.7-rc5, and I'm not aware of any other
> changes they may contend with, but best to be on the right tree to be
> sure.

General rule is to base on the target subsystem tree. In this case
it's Bart's gpio/for-next AFAIU.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ