linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] gpiolib: cdev: relocate debounce_period_us from struct gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mc7fc2sM41oDNhCavvfZHCzwv2Y_ToquFwD+BhkVHwbhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 22:05:29 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Cc: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] gpiolib: cdev: relocate debounce_period_us from
 struct gpio_desc

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 5:47 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:08:05PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:56:37PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > While I think of it, what tree should I be basing on?
> > These patches are based on v6.7-rc5, and I'm not aware of any other
> > changes they may contend with, but best to be on the right tree to be
> > sure.
>
> General rule is to base on the target subsystem tree. In this case
> it's Bart's gpio/for-next AFAIU.
>

Normally the patches should apply on top of

    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git gpio/for-next

Any conflicts between maintainer trees are handled upstream.

Bart

> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko