linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] of: irq: add wake capable bit to of_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANg-bXB0EAd-703oOzXsFSS72Z3bfT8La_5K=W41L+B1uMz2-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:05:16 -0700
From: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@...omium.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>, 
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] of: irq: add wake capable bit to of_irq_resource()

> If a device has multiple interrupts, but none named "wakeup" you are
> saying all the interrupts are wakeup capable. That's not right though.
> Only the device knows which interrupts are wakeup capable. You need:
>
> return wakeindex >= 0 && wakeindex == index;

I was assuming logic described in the DT bindings:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/wakeup-source.txt
"Also, if device is marked as a wakeup source, then all the primary
interrupt(s) can be used as wakeup interrupt(s)."