linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] pci: qcom: Add support for IPQ5332

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:20:49 +0200
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
        vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, mani@...nel.org,
        quic_nsekar@...cinc.com, quic_srichara@...cinc.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        quic_varada@...cinc.com, quic_devipriy@...cinc.com,
        quic_kathirav@...cinc.com, quic_anusha@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] pci: qcom: Add support for IPQ5332

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 08:30, Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> The Qualcomm IPQ5332 PCIe controller instances are based on
> SNPS core 5.90a with Gen3 Single-lane and Dual-lane support.
> The Qualcomm IP rev is 1.27.0 and hence using the 1_27_0 ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
> ---
> This patch depends on the below series which adds PCIe support in
> Qualcomm IPQ9574
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230519090219.15925-1-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com/

The series did not receive updates since the end of May. Should we
expect the next iteration of that series? Otherwise depending on it
sounds like a dead end.

>
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 109df587234e..3d54de1a71df 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -1642,6 +1642,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = {
>         { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-apq8064", .data = &cfg_2_1_0 },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-apq8084", .data = &cfg_1_0_0 },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq4019", .data = &cfg_2_4_0 },
> +       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq5332", .data = &cfg_1_27_0 },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq6018", .data = &cfg_2_9_0 },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064", .data = &cfg_2_1_0 },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2", .data = &cfg_2_1_0 },
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry