linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: add QCrypto nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2a064fde-0c90-4ef5-86bf-5dc9172149ab@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:52:57 +0530
From:   Om Prakash Singh <quic_omprsing@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
CC:     <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: add QCrypto nodes



On 12/14/2023 12:52 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/12/2023 06:41, Om Prakash Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/12/2023 8:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 12/12/2023 14:32, Om Prakash Singh wrote:
>>>> Add the QCE and Crypto BAM DMA nodes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Om Prakash Singh <quic_omprsing@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in V2:
>>>>     - Update DT node sequence as per register ascending order
>>>
>>> Hm, I don't see it...
>>>
>>>>     - Fix DT node properties as per convention
>>>>
>>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>>> index 66f1eb83cca7..7b705df21f4e 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>>> @@ -2272,6 +2272,28 @@ ipa: ipa@...0000 {
>>>>    			status = "disabled";
>>>>    		};
>>>>    
>>>> +		cryptobam: dma-controller@...4000 {
>>>
>>> It still looks like not correctly ordered by unit address against other
>>> nodes in the file.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>> Probably I am missing something basic here. I am trying to put entries
>> addresses that are sorted wrt their current adjacent.
>>
>> And it looks fine to me.
>>
>> 1c0e000 (current exist)
>> 1dc4000 (newly added)
>> 1dfa000	(newly added)
>> 1e40000	(current exist)
> 
> Then why the diff shows:
> @@ -2272,6 +2272,28 @@ ipa: ipa@...0000 {
> above your changes?

my mistake! Local change was not added in updated patch.
Submitting V3

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>