[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83099016-f609-4ac0-94ab-909ac9c96582@bytedance.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 20:21:53 +0800
From: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@...sion.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stone.xulei@...sion.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: remove next_buddy_marked
On 12/14/23 4:18 PM, Vincent Guittot Wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 06:20, Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@...sion.com> wrote:
>>
>> Remove unused `next_buddy_marked` in `check_preempt_wakeup_fair`
>>
>
> Fixes: 5e963f2bd465 ("sched/fair: Commit to EEVDF")
After this commit @pse preempts curr without being the NEXT_BUDDY, but
IMHO it should be, so how about this?
@@ -8259,8 +8259,11 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
/*
* XXX pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) != se ?
*/
- if (pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) == pse)
+ if (pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) == pse) {
+ if (!next_buddy_marked)
+ set_next_buddy(pse);
goto preempt;
+ }
return;
which will align with before.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists