[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca828ee1-93f7-432e-b95d-e67c35cdcdb5@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:23:10 +0200
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
To: Venkata Prasad Potturu <venkataprasad.potturu@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak@...il.com>,
Syed Saba Kareem <Syed.SabaKareem@....com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Marian Postevca <posteuca@...ex.one>,
Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>,
V sujith kumar Reddy <Vsujithkumar.Reddy@....com>,
Mastan Katragadda <Mastan.Katragadda@....com>,
Ajit Kumar Pandey <AjitKumar.Pandey@....com>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: SOF: topology: Add new DAI type entry for
SOF_DAI_AMD_BT
On 12/11/23 07:58, Venkata Prasad Potturu wrote:
>
> On 12/10/23 21:20, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> On 12/10/23 16:01, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 12:12:53PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/23 11:51, Venkata Prasad Potturu wrote:
>>>>> This should send to SOF git repo for rewiew, once SOF reviewers
>>>>> approved
>>>>> this, again need to send to broonie git.
>>>>> All the changes in sound/soc/sof/ path should go to SOF git.
>>>> Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the SOF dev workflow. So it's not
>>>> enough to have this patch cc-ed to
>>>> sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org?
>>> The SOF people basically do their own thing in github at
>>>
>>> https://github.com/thesofproject/linux
>>>
>>> with a github workflow and submit their patches upstream in batches a
>>> few times a release, however my understanding is that their workflow can
>>> cope with things going in directly upstream as well.
>> Thanks for clarifying, Mark! That would greatly simplify and speedup
>> the whole process, at least for trivial patches like this one.
>
> Hi Cristian,
>
> We have created a Pull request in SOF git hub for I2S BT support.
> please hold v2 version SOF patches till below PR get's merged.
> PR:- https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/4742
Hi Venkata,
If this is going to be handled via the github workflow, this patch
should be removed from the series. Since there is no dependency on it,
I cannot see a reason to put v2 on hold.
Do I miss something?
Thanks,
Cristian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists