[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51821c81-82ef-4b39-a8c5-660a8ee355f0@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 09:40:12 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, "Shaopeng
Tan" <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>, Maciej Wieczór-Retman
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/29] selftests/resctrl: Refactor get_cbm_mask() and
rename to get_full_cbm()
Hi Ilpo,
On 12/15/2023 7:04 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Callers of get_cbm_mask() are required to pass a string into which the
> capacity bitmask (CBM) is read. Neither CAT nor CMT tests need the
> bitmask as string but just convert it into an unsigned long value.
>
> Another limitation is that the bit mask reader can only read
> .../cbm_mask files.
>
> Generalize the bit mask reading function into get_bit_mask() such that
> it can be used to handle other files besides the .../cbm_mask and
> handles the unsigned long conversion within get_bit_mask() using
> fscanf(). Change get_cbm_mask() to use get_bit_mask() and rename it to
> get_full_cbm() to better indicate what the function does.
>
> Return error from get_full_cbm() if the bitmask is zero for some reason
> because it makes the code more robust as the selftests naturally assume
> the bitmask has some bits.
>
> Also mark cache_type const while at it and remove useless comments that
> are related to processing of CBM bits.
>
> Co-developed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists