[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7163718b-0a92-4383-b475-aac52354489d@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 20:25:57 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
andi.shyti@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, tomasz.figa@...il.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
arnd@...db.de, semen.protsenko@...aro.org
Cc: andre.draszik@...aro.org, saravanak@...gle.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] dt-bindings: clock: google,gs101: fix CMU_TOP gate
clock names
On 15/12/2023 20:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/12/2023 11:23, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> Hi, Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 12/15/23 08:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 14/12/2023 11:52, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>>> The gs101 clock names are derived from the clock register names under
>>>> some certain rules. In particular, for the gate clocks the following is
>>>> documented and expected in the gs101 clock driver:
>>>>
>>>> Replace CLK_CON_GAT_CLKCMU with CLK_GOUT_CMU and gout_cmu
>>>> Replace CLK_CON_GAT_GATE_CLKCMU with CLK_GOUT_CMU and gout_cmu
>>>>
>>>> For gates remove _UID _BLK _IPCLKPORT and _RSTNSYNC
>>>
>>> I don't understand what it has to do with the bindings.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The CMU TOP gate clock names missed to include the required "CMU"
>>>> differentiator which will cause name collisions with the gate clock names
>>>> of other clock units. Fix the TOP gate clock names and include "CMU" in
>>>> their name.
>>>
>>> Neither here. Clock names are not related to defines.
>>>
>>
>> When saying "clock names" I meant the clock symbolic names that are
>> defined in the bindings, the _id passed in GATE(_id, ) if you want.
>
> Please re-phrase the commit message to say that you need to rename the
> defines in the bindings headers. If you change anything else, like clock
> names, then it should be separate patch.
I forgot:
You can also respin this patch separately, as soon as possible, because
it has to go this cycle.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists