[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG-Bmocu0nL-AW=nR7ZaTG4fzRvw4XSq5grk4N-wDRF0opMR4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:24:36 +0530
From: Ghanshyam Agrawal <ghanshyam1898@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com, Xinhui.Pan@....com,
airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, Hawking.Zhang@....com, candice.li@....com,
Le.Ma@....com, lijo.lazar@....com, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu: drm: amd: fixed typos
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 10:59 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Hi--
>
> On 12/14/23 21:20, Ghanshyam Agrawal wrote:
> > Fixed multiple typos in atomfirmware.h
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ghanshyam Agrawal <ghanshyam1898@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/atomfirmware.h | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/atomfirmware.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/atomfirmware.h
> > index fa7d6ced786f..41d553921adf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/atomfirmware.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/atomfirmware.h
> > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ atom_bios_string = "ATOM"
> > };
> > */
> >
> > -#pragma pack(1) /* BIOS data must use byte aligment*/
> > +#pragma pack(1) /* BIOS data must use byte alignment */
> >
> > enum atombios_image_offset{
> > OFFSET_TO_ATOM_ROM_HEADER_POINTER = 0x00000048,
> > @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ struct atom_dtd_format
> > uint8_t refreshrate;
> > };
> >
> > -/* atom_dtd_format.modemiscinfo defintion */
> > +/* atom_dtd_format.modemiscinfo definition */
> > enum atom_dtd_format_modemiscinfo{
> > ATOM_HSYNC_POLARITY = 0x0002,
> > ATOM_VSYNC_POLARITY = 0x0004,
> > @@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ struct lcd_info_v2_1
> > uint32_t reserved1[8];
> > };
> >
> > -/* lcd_info_v2_1.panel_misc defintion */
> > +/* lcd_info_v2_1.panel_misc definition */
> > enum atom_lcd_info_panel_misc{
> > ATOM_PANEL_MISC_FPDI =0x0002,
> > };
> > @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ enum atom_gpio_pin_assignment_gpio_id {
> > /* gpio_id pre-define id for multiple usage */
> > /* GPIO use to control PCIE_VDDC in certain SLT board */
> > PCIE_VDDC_CONTROL_GPIO_PINID = 56,
> > - /* if PP_AC_DC_SWITCH_GPIO_PINID in Gpio_Pin_LutTable, AC/DC swithing feature is enable */
> > + /* if PP_AC_DC_SWITCH_GPIO_PINID in Gpio_Pin_LutTable, AC/DC switching feature is enable */
>
> s/enable/enabled/
>
> > PP_AC_DC_SWITCH_GPIO_PINID = 60,
> > /* VDDC_REGULATOR_VRHOT_GPIO_PINID in Gpio_Pin_LutTable, VRHot feature is enable */
>
> Ditto.
> There may be a few more that need this same treatment.
>
> > VDDC_VRHOT_GPIO_PINID = 61,
>
> The other changes look good as far as they go, but codespell reports
> a few more misspellings to consider:
>
> atomfirmware.h:213: aligment ==> alignment
> atomfirmware.h:257: Offest ==> Offset
> atomfirmware.h:258: Offest ==> Offset
> atomfirmware.h:390: Offest ==> Offset
> atomfirmware.h:455: defintion ==> definition
> atomfirmware.h:648: defintion ==> definition
> atomfirmware.h:686: swithing ==> switching
> atomfirmware.h:704: calcualted ==> calculated
> atomfirmware.h:967: compability ==> compatibility
> atomfirmware.h:981: intenal ==> internal
> atomfirmware.h:993: intenal ==> internal
> atomfirmware.h:3469: sequece ==> sequence
> atomfirmware.h:3507: indiate ==> indicate
> atomfirmware.h:4429: stucture ==> structure
> atomfirmware.h:4430: stucture ==> structure
> atomfirmware.h:4462: regiser ==> register
>
>
> thanks.
> --
> #Randy
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
> https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html
Hi Randy,
Thanks for your feedback. I will correct the grammatical errors.
Regarding the other codespell suggestions, if I make the changes
then checkpatch script gives a lot of errors and warnings. Some
are related to usage of tabs, line lengths etc. Being a beginner
in the linux kernel development, I am not sure how to fix
(or whether to ignore) those warnings. Would it be okay if I
proceed with only the small number of changes I have suggested
with this patch itself?
Thanks & Regards,
Ghanshyam Agrawal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists