linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 1/2] ufs: core: Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c00aeb47c67599d632cced1017696cf1295d83ea.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 06:58:52 +0000
From: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@...iatek.com>
To: "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "jejb@...ux.ibm.com"
	<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com"
	<quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com>, "martin.petersen@...cle.com"
	<martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>, "avri.altman@....com"
	<avri.altman@....com>, "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, "chu.stanley@...il.com"
	<chu.stanley@...il.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "quic_cang@...cinc.com"
	<quic_cang@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/2] ufs: core: Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs
 driver

On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 18:13 +0530, Maramaina Naresh wrote:
>  	 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>  Register ufs driver to CPU latency PM QoS framework to improve
> ufs device random io performance.
> 
> PM QoS initialization will insert new QoS request into the CPU
> latency QoS list with the maximum latency PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE
> value.
> 
> UFS driver will vote for performance mode on scale up and power
> save mode for scale down.
> 
> If clock scaling feature is not enabled then voting will be based
> on clock on or off condition.
> 
> Provided sysfs interface to enable/disable PM QoS feature.
> 
> tiotest benchmark tool io performance results on sm8550 platform:
> 
> 1. Without PM QoS support
> 	Type (Speed in)    | Average of 18 iterations
> 	Random Write(IPOS) | 41065.13
> 	Random Read(IPOS)  | 37101.3
> 
> 2. With PM QoS support
> 	Type (Speed in)    | Average of 18 iterations
> 	Random Write(IPOS) | 46784.9
> 	Random Read(IPOS)  | 42943.4
> (Improvement with PM QoS = ~15%).
> 

Reviewed-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>