[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231215141631.aooan5rby6fwfdof@quack3>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 15:16:31 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] writeback: Factor should_writeback_folio() out of
write_cache_pages()
On Thu 14-12-23 14:25:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
>
> Reduce write_cache_pages() by about 30 lines; much of it is commentary,
> but it all bundles nicely into an obvious function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
I like this! Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 5d33e7b468e2cc..5a3df8665ff4f9 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -2394,6 +2394,36 @@ static void writeback_get_batch(struct address_space *mapping,
> &wbc->fbatch);
> }
>
> +static bool should_writeback_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
> + struct writeback_control *wbc, struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Folio truncated or invalidated. We can freely skip it then,
> + * even for data integrity operations: the folio has disappeared
> + * concurrently, so there could be no real expectation of this
> + * data integrity operation even if there is now a new, dirty
> + * folio at the same pagecache index.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Did somebody write it for us? */
> + if (!folio_test_dirty(folio))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
> + if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
> + return false;
> + folio_wait_writeback(folio);
> + }
> +
> + BUG_ON(folio_test_writeback(folio));
> + if (!folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * write_cache_pages - walk the list of dirty pages of the given address space and write all of them.
> * @mapping: address space structure to write
> @@ -2462,38 +2492,13 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> wbc->done_index = folio->index;
>
> folio_lock(folio);
> -
> - /*
> - * Page truncated or invalidated. We can freely skip it
> - * then, even for data integrity operations: the page
> - * has disappeared concurrently, so there could be no
> - * real expectation of this data integrity operation
> - * even if there is now a new, dirty page at the same
> - * pagecache address.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping)) {
> -continue_unlock:
> + if (!should_writeback_folio(mapping, wbc, folio)) {
> folio_unlock(folio);
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (!folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
> - /* someone wrote it for us */
> - goto continue_unlock;
> - }
> -
> - if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
> - if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_NONE)
> - folio_wait_writeback(folio);
> - else
> - goto continue_unlock;
> - }
> -
> - BUG_ON(folio_test_writeback(folio));
> - if (!folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio))
> - goto continue_unlock;
> -
> trace_wbc_writepage(wbc, inode_to_bdi(mapping->host));
> +
> error = writepage(folio, wbc, data);
> nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> if (unlikely(error)) {
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists