linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 22:33:20 +0530
From: Naresh Maramaina <quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley"
	<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger
	<matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Bart Van Assche
	<bvanassche@....org>,
        Stanley Jhu <chu.stanley@...il.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "quic_cang@...cinc.com"
	<quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
        "quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com"
	<quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver

On 12/15/2023 2:35 PM, Avri Altman wrote:
>> Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver. This improves random io
>> performance by 15% for ufs.
>>
>> tiotest benchmark tool io performance results on sm8550 platform:
> Will it possible to provide test results for non-ufs4.0 platforms?
> e.g. for SM8250, just to know if it would make sense to backport this to earlier releases.
> 

Hi Avri,

Performed tiotest benchmark tool io performance test on SM8450 platform 
and see good improvement there as well.

> Thanks,
> Avri

Thanks,
Naresh.