[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DM6PR04MB657594F8BFE75A8F68855A2EFC93A@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 09:05:33 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Maramaina Naresh <quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com>, "James E.J. Bottomley"
<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>, Matthias Brugger
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Bart Van Assche
<bvanassche@....org>, Stanley Jhu <chu.stanley@...il.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "quic_cang@...cinc.com"
<quic_cang@...cinc.com>, "quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com"
<quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 0/2] Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver
> Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver. This improves random io
> performance by 15% for ufs.
>
> tiotest benchmark tool io performance results on sm8550 platform:
Will it possible to provide test results for non-ufs4.0 platforms?
e.g. for SM8250, just to know if it would make sense to backport this to earlier releases.
Thanks,
Avri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists