linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] nvme: add csi, ms and nuse to sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZYG_zlnvfLOJHEJM@kbusch-mbp>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:07:42 -0700
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] nvme: add csi, ms and nuse to sysfs

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 04:42:20PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> Hi Keith,
> 
> On 19/12/2023 0:55, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 05:59:48PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > > Rebased on the current nvme/nvme-6.8 branch and added the Review tags. Also
> > > addressed the printk format issue pointed out by Chaitanya.
> > 
> > Thanks, added to nvme-6.8.
> 
> I'm rebasing my fixes to the PI bug (which are not trivial) on top of
> nvme-6.8 and Daniel's series.
> I've found that this branch is missing some fixes from the master that I've
> added manually to local nvme-6.8 branch.
> When do you plan to rebase the nvme-6.8 on top of master ?
> It will be helpful, otherwise my patches will not apply cleanly on your
> branch. :)

linux-nvme pulls go through Jens' linux-block repo, so we have to be
based on the appropriate branch from there. We already have some late
fixes in 6.7 that create minor merge conflicts for our existing 6.8
branch, so we may provide a reference resolution branch with the pull
request if conflicts are non-trivial. That might be an option for your
fixes if you can make them work atop existing nvme-6.8 without the
conflicting 6.7 changes.

Sometime after the next merge window opens, Jens will rebase his 6.8
block tree to Linus', and we usually get a 2nd feature pull request
within the merge window from that new baseline. That might be an option
if you want to wait a couple more weeks.