[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xkmmbgbg2japfunuure2kktbxdkotteawwgzsjq6giafmwuosz@3no7qov5nzei>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:06:08 +0100
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>, Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] leds: qcom-lpg: Add PM660L configuration and
compatible
On 2023-12-19 10:33:25, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:17:16AM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>
> > Note that I have one more unmerged leds patch around, that hasn't been looked
> > at either. Would it help to send this once again, perhaps with more reviewers/
> > testing (Johan, would you mind taking a look too)?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20220719213034.1664056-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/
>
> Yes, I suggest you resend that one too so that it ends up in Lee's
> inbox.
I will rebase, test and resend it too. Just asking if you notice any glaring
issues with this patch, as it won't be the first time it has been resent after
not being looked at for some time.
- Marijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists