[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYKhVlgrlvq3HbFt@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:09:58 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] leds: qcom-lpg: Add PM660L configuration and
compatible
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 11:06:08AM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-12-19 10:33:25, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:17:16AM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> >
> > > Note that I have one more unmerged leds patch around, that hasn't been looked
> > > at either. Would it help to send this once again, perhaps with more reviewers/
> > > testing (Johan, would you mind taking a look too)?
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20220719213034.1664056-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/
> >
> > Yes, I suggest you resend that one too so that it ends up in Lee's
> > inbox.
>
> I will rebase, test and resend it too. Just asking if you notice any glaring
> issues with this patch, as it won't be the first time it has been resent after
> not being looked at for some time.
I haven't look at this code before and only skimmed it now, but your
patch looks correct to me.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists