| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:53:18 +0200 From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>, Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>, Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS: wifi: brcm80211: remove non-existing SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes: > On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 10:01 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote: >> > >> > > When sending an email to SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com, the server >> > > responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.' >> >> Is the claim here true? In another thread I replied all including this list >> and I am not getting a bounce message. > > I also got the bounce, FWIW. And Lukas is using gmail ... if you're not > accepting mail from gmail I'm not sure you get to call it "email" in the > 21st century, for (better or) worse... And is Infineon even contributing anything to upstream? At least I don't have recollection any recent activity, though happy to be proven wrong. We shouldn't have dormant information in MAINTAINERS file. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists