linux-kernel - Re: MAINTAINERS: wifi: brcm80211: remove non-existing SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZYLOef1s5Ul7uz3_@archie.me>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 18:22:33 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
	Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
	Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
	Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
	Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS: wifi: brcm80211: remove non-existing
 SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 12:53:18PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 10:01 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > > When sending an email to SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com, the server
> >> > > responds '550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.'
> >> 
> >> Is the claim here true? In another thread I replied all including this list 
> >> and I am not getting a bounce message.
> >
> > I also got the bounce, FWIW. And Lukas is using gmail ... if you're not
> > accepting mail from gmail I'm not sure you get to call it "email" in the
> > 21st century, for (better or) worse...
> 
> And is Infineon even contributing anything to upstream? At least I don't
> have recollection any recent activity, though happy to be proven wrong.
> We shouldn't have dormant information in MAINTAINERS file.
> 

I'm also using gmail (and GMX as backup). When I sent my reply about rPI
testing [1] with SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com Cc'ed, I got `Address
not found` error instead (but the DSN message was in spam folder instead
as I treated it as junk).

For Infineon, they're now focusing on TPM subsystem, with the latest message
is 6 months (or a semester in academic speak) ago [2].

Thanks.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZYLKftqKFJ_PMmF3@archie.me/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230613180259.3525-4-Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com/

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)