linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/50] x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c: fix missing include

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231219020507.cknqkwp2l5ivnrf7@moria.home.lan>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 21:05:07 -0500
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, X86-kernel <x86@...nel.org>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, paulmck@...nel.org,
	keescook@...omium.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com,
	boqun.feng@...il.com, brauner@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/50] x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c: fix missing include

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 04:38:33PM +0530, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> For the x86 patches [2-5/50], should the patch subject be a bit more
> generic rather than having the full file name listed.
> 
> For example, this patch could be "x86/fpu: Fix missing include".

In the latest version of the patchset I've just rolled all of the
arch/x86 missing includes into one patch.