lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 21:06:05 -0500
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
	tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	paulmck@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
	longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, brauner@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/50] x86/lib/cache-smp.c: fix missing include

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 04:18:29PM +0530, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.c b/arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.c
> > index 7c48ff4ae8d1..7af743bd3b13 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.c
> > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> >  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> >  #include <linux/smp.h>
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> >  
> 
> I believe the norm is to have the linux/ includes first, followed by the
> the asm/ ones. Shouldn't this case be the same?

I haven't seen that? I generally do the reverse, simpler includes first,
not that I have any reason for that...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ