linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/50] x86/lib/cache-smp.c: fix missing include

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231219020605.edmlnz2hgjb4h4im@moria.home.lan>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 21:06:05 -0500
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
	tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	paulmck@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
	longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, brauner@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/50] x86/lib/cache-smp.c: fix missing include

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 04:18:29PM +0530, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.c b/arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.c
> > index 7c48ff4ae8d1..7af743bd3b13 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.c
> > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> >  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> >  #include <linux/smp.h>
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> >  
> 
> I believe the norm is to have the linux/ includes first, followed by the
> the asm/ ones. Shouldn't this case be the same?

I haven't seen that? I generally do the reverse, simpler includes first,
not that I have any reason for that...