linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: drop tabs from local variable declarations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZYGxefhI9UpwknhD@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:06:33 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: drop tabs from local variable declarations

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 03:23:22PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> 
> Older code has an annoying habit of putting tabs between the type and the
> name of the variable. This doesn't really add to readability and newer
> code doesn't do it so make the entire file consistent.
> 
> While at it: convert 'unsigned' to 'unsigned int'.

Not a big change to be a burden for backporting I suppose.
Code wise looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

...

> +	struct gpio_chip *gc = desc->gdev->chip;
> +	int ret;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	unsigned int offset;

I'm wondering if you can make it reversed xmas tree order.
This will make it even more consistent between functions.

...

> +	bool ret = false;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct gpio_chip *gc;

Ditto.

...

> +	struct gpio_chip *gc = gdev->chip;
> +	struct gpio_desc *desc;

(okay with above, but...)

> +	unsigned int gpio = gdev->base;

> +	int value;

Ditto.

> +	bool is_out;
> +	bool is_irq;
> +	bool active_low;

And ditto.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko