[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87edfggadg.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:30:03 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Muhammad Muzammil <m.muzzammilashraf@...il.com>, rdunlap@...radead.org,
gustavoars@...nel.org
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Muzammil Ashraf
<m.muzzammilashraf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: kernel-doc: Bug fixed for erroneous warning
Muhammad Muzammil <m.muzzammilashraf@...il.com> writes:
> From: Muzammil Ashraf <m.muzzammilashraf@...il.com>
>
> kernel-doc: fixed erroneous warning generated by '__counted_by'
>
> Signed-off-by: Muzammil Ashraf <m.muzzammilashraf@...il.com>
> ---
> scripts/kernel-doc | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
> index 1484127db104..ea9688df0e93 100755
> --- a/scripts/kernel-doc
> +++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
> @@ -1661,6 +1661,7 @@ sub check_sections($$$$$) {
> }
> elsif (($decl_type eq "struct") or
> ($decl_type eq "union")) {
> + next if (index("@_", "__counted_by") != -1);
> emit_warning("${file}:$.",
> "Excess $decl_type member " .
> "'$sects[$sx]' " .
Could you give an example of the warnings that this patch addresses?
I've not seen any caused by __counted_by since f600c77aeaff was applied
to docs-next. What did it miss?
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists