lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231220012345.17791-1-jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:23:45 +0800
From: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@...rfivetech.com>
To: <conor@...nel.org>
CC: <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<jisheng.teoh@...rfivetech.com>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux@...ck-us.net>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
	<wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] dt-bindings: watchdog: starfive,jh7100-wdt: Add compatible for JH8100

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:43:07 +0000
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:37:38PM +0800, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:41:37 +0100
> > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > On 18/12/2023 15:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:  
> > > >>
> > > >> I have real doubts that you ever tested your entire solution
> > > >> with this binding. Where is the DTS?
> > > >>    
> > > > 
> > > > Currently, the DTS is still in internal and yet to upstream as
> > > > it depends on [1].    
> > > 
> > > Yeah, so you send untested code which cannot work or pass tests.
> > > If you do not test your code, we need to be able to at least
> > > verify it, so send your DTS. Otherwise I cannot trust that this
> > > works at all. 
> > Will submit it with DTS once things have cleared up.
> > Thanks for the comment.   
> 
> [1] is not going to applied for a while since the SoC doesn't actually
> exist yet and is pre-tapeout on an FPGA. I would just send the dts
> patch adding the watchdog alongside the series, or else you'll be
> waiting for quite a while. Or even link to the node on github or
> whatever.
> 

Ok, will add the watchdog dts alongside this series and mention its
dependency on [1]. Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ