[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87il4t9wi1.fsf@oltmanns.dev>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:09:28 +0100
From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
To: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Samuel Holland
<samuel@...lland.org>, Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
Purism Kernel Team
<kernel@...i.sm>, Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>, Neil Armstrong
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: Add constraints on PLL-VIDEO0's
n/m ratio
On 2023-12-19 at 17:54:19 +0100, Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com> wrote:
> Dne ponedeljek, 18. december 2023 ob 14:35:22 CET je Frank Oltmanns napisal(a):
>> The Allwinner A64 manual lists the following constraint for the
>> PLL-VIDEO0 clock: 8 <= N/M <= 25
>>
>> Use this constraint.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
>> index c034ac027d1c..75d839da446c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c
>> @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_SDM_GATE_LOCK(pll_audio_base_clk, "pll-audio-base",
>> BIT(28), /* lock */
>> CLK_SET_RATE_UNGATE);
>>
>> -static SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX_CLOSEST(pll_video0_clk, "pll-video0",
>> +static SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX_FEAT_NM_RATIO(pll_video0_clk,
>> + "pll-video0",
>> "osc24M", 0x010,
>> 192000000, /* Minimum rate */
>> 1008000000, /* Maximum rate */
>> @@ -80,7 +81,10 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX_CLOSEST(pll_video0_clk, "pll-vid
>> 297000000, /* frac rate 1 */
>> BIT(31), /* gate */
>> BIT(28), /* lock */
>> - CLK_SET_RATE_UNGATE);
>> + CLK_SET_RATE_UNGATE,
>> + CCU_FEATURE_FRACTIONAL |
>> + CCU_FEATURE_CLOSEST_RATE,
>
> Above flags are unrelated change, put them in new patch if needed.
You might notice that I am using a new macro for initializing the
pll_video0_clk struct:
New: SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX_FEAT_NM_RATIO
Old: SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX_CLOSEST
Setting the two CCU_FEATURE flags is part of the old initialization
macro.
I'll add SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX_NM_RATIO_CLOSEST which
hopefully resolves the confusion.
Thanks,
Frank
>
> Best regards,
> Jernej
>
>> + 8, 25); /* min/max nm ratio */
>>
>> static SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK(pll_ve_clk, "pll-ve",
>> "osc24M", 0x018,
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists