[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f41ab6b0-d2e4-481b-b972-99dd9048eafa@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:48:31 +0100
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik
<gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] KVM: s390: Minor refactor of base/ext facility
lists
On 12/19/23 15:08, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> Directly use the size of the arrays instead of going through the
> indirection of kvm_s390_fac_size().
> Don't use magic number for the number of entries in the non hypervisor
> managed facility bit mask list.
> Make the constraint of that number on kvm_s390_fac_base obvious.
> Get rid of implicit double anding of stfle_fac_list.
>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@...ux.ibm.com>
@Nina: I'm currently still recovering from a cold and hence I'm not
fully able to grasp this patch.
May I drop it and we re-visit it next year for 6.9?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists