lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ7BO455gN1QBVdSqe3VupYaEnnDbGty031nj_uPXgHfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 12:35:30 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: remove extra_checks

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 9:11 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:

> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> extra_checks is only used in a few places. It also depends on
> a non-standard DEBUG define one needs to add to the source file. The
> overhead of removing it should be minimal (we already use pure
> might_sleep() in the code anyway) so drop it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>

I see you pinged me to fix this and I didn't get around to look into it
even, but you fixed it just as fine yourself :D
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ