linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: remove extra

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZYL0MWAQ-frYLnZq@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:03:29 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: remove extra_checks

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> 
> extra_checks is only used in a few places. It also depends on

> a non-standard DEBUG define one needs to add to the source file.

Huh?!

What then CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO is about?

> The
> overhead of removing it should be minimal (we already use pure
> might_sleep() in the code anyway) so drop it.

...

I agree on might_sleep() changes, but WARN_ON(), see above why.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko