[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbpcwADJnZz1Q0KQ-gJv8FvnvJS=4PpMF+Np4rNCN3x+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 12:42:27 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Takahiro Akashi <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support pinctrl protocol
Hi Peng,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:52 PM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com> wrote:
In this example, as it is not intended to reflect any specific hardware,
use the latest canonical naming:
> +
> + scmi_pinctrl: protocol@19 {
> + reg = <0x19>;
> + #pinctrl-cells = <0>;
> +
> + i2c2-pins {
> + groups = "i2c2_a", "i2c2_b";
groups = "g_i2c2_a", "g_i2c2_b";
> + function = "i2c2";
function = "f_i2c2";
> + };
> +
> + mdio-pins {
> + groups = "avb_mdio";
groups = "g_avb_mdio";
> + drive-strength = <24>;
> + };
> +
> + keys_pins: keys-pins {
> + pins = "GP_5_17", "GP_5_20", "GP_5_22", "GP_2_1";
pins = "gpio_5_17", "gpio_5_20", "gpio_5_22", "gpio_2_1";
These names look odd to me, like these are actually groups
with pins 5..17 etc. Should it be groups = "g_gpio_5_17" etc?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists