[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DU0PR04MB94170BCA413C2FD48A397B538896A@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 01:58:09 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
<peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Cristian Marussi
<cristian.marussi@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>, Linus
Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha
Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, dl-linux-imx
<linux-imx@....com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support pinctrl
protocol
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support pinctrl
> protocol
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> On 23-12-15, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > Add SCMI v3.2 pinctrl protocol bindings and example.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 99
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > index 4591523b51a0..bfd2b6a89979 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > @@ -247,6 +247,85 @@ properties:
> > reg:
> > const: 0x18
> >
> > + protocol@19:
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -401,6 +480,26 @@ examples:
> > scmi_powercap: protocol@18 {
> > reg = <0x18>;
> > };
> > +
> > + scmi_pinctrl: protocol@19 {
> > + reg = <0x19>;
> > + #pinctrl-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + i2c2-pins {
> > + groups = "i2c2_a", "i2c2_b";
> > + function = "i2c2";
> > + };
> > +
> > + mdio-pins {
> > + groups = "avb_mdio";
> > + drive-strength = <24>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + keys_pins: keys-pins {
> > + pins = "GP_5_17", "GP_5_20", "GP_5_22", "GP_2_1";
> > + bias-pull-up;
> > + };
> > + };
>
> This example is different to the one you mentioned within the cover-letter. I
> didn't checked all patches just want to ask which API will be implemented by
> this patchset?
I kept this change since it was tested by Oleksii, but anyway i.MX not use these.
The API, I suppose you are asking about this?
static const struct pinctrl_ops pinctrl_scmi_pinctrl_ops = {
.get_groups_count = pinctrl_scmi_get_groups_count,
.get_group_name = pinctrl_scmi_get_group_name,
.get_group_pins = pinctrl_scmi_get_group_pins,
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
.dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_all,
.dt_free_map = pinconf_generic_dt_free_map,
#endif
};
static const struct pinctrl_ops pinctrl_scmi_imx_pinctrl_ops = {
.get_groups_count = pinctrl_scmi_get_groups_count,
.get_group_name = pinctrl_scmi_get_group_name,
.get_group_pins = pinctrl_scmi_get_group_pins,
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
.dt_node_to_map = pinctrl_scmi_imx_dt_node_to_map,
.dt_free_map = pinconf_generic_dt_free_map,
#endif
};
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
> > };
> > };
> >
> >
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists