[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231220081028.7cd7e8e2@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:10:28 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland
<mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Subject: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Remove stale comment from ring_buffer_size()
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
It's been 11 years since the ring_buffer_size() function was updated to
use the nr_pages from the buffer->buffers[cpu] structure instead of using
the buffer->nr_pages that no longer exists.
The comment in the code is more of what a change log should have and is
pretty much useless for development. It's saying how things worked back in
2012 that bares no purpose on today's code. Remove it.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/84d3b41a72bd43dbb9d44921ef535c92@AcuMS.aculab.com/
Reported-by: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 173d2595ce2d..7887d61d5b56 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -5122,12 +5122,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_iter_advance);
*/
unsigned long ring_buffer_size(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
{
- /*
- * Earlier, this method returned
- * buffer->subbuf_size * buffer->nr_pages
- * Since the nr_pages field is now removed, we have converted this to
- * return the per cpu buffer value.
- */
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
return 0;
--
2.42.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists