[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYR5bh596slWaqjF@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 19:44:14 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex.vinarskis@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: Switch to generalized quirk table
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:11:13PM +0100, Aleksandrs Vinarskis wrote:
> Introduce generic quirk table, and port existing walkaround for select
> Microsoft devices to it. This is a preparation for
> QUIRK_CLOCK_DIVIDER_UNITY.
Check your repository, seems you forgot to add -s to git commit --amend or so.
...
> +static const struct pci_device_id quirk_ids[] = {
> /* Microsoft Surface Go (version 1) I2C4 */
> - { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x9d64, 0x152d, 0x1182), },
> + { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x9d64, 0x152d, 0x1182),
> + .driver_data = QUIRK_IGNORE_RESOURCE_CONFLICTS },
> /* Microsoft Surface Go 2 I2C4 */
> - { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x9d64, 0x152d, 0x1237), },
> + { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x9d64, 0x152d, 0x1237),
> + .driver_data = QUIRK_IGNORE_RESOURCE_CONFLICTS },
> { }
> };
I would suggest to look at the existing style, as I also in doubts on the
above. Perhaps the following is more common in MFD subsystem?
{
PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x9d64, 0x152d, 0x1237),
.driver_data = QUIRK_IGNORE_RESOURCE_CONFLICTS
},
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists