linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] memory: emif: ifdefs and platform_driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 22:25:27 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] memory: emif: ifdefs and platform_driver_probe()

Hello Krzysztof,

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 09:46:29PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/12/2023 20:31, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > while preparing the series to convert the platform drivers below
> > drivers/memory to use .remove_new()[1], I noticed that the emif driver
> > unnecessarily uses some #ifdefs and doesn't use platform_driver_probe()
> > correctly. Note there is a conflict between these series. Tell me if you
> > need support to resolve this.
> 
> I was waiting here for some Reviews or Tested-by. Time passed, reviews
> did not happen but it is too late for me to take it for the next merge
> window. I will take it after the merge window.

Thanks for the status update. That's very appreciated. (And taking it
for the next development cycle is entirely fine, that's just a drive-by
series, nothing on my side depends on it.)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)