[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231221222932.GA196757-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:29:32 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@...iatek.com>, Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/16] dt-bindings: media: mediatek: mdp3: merge the
indentical RDMA under display
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:28:52AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/12/2023 11:08, Moudy Ho wrote:
> > To simplify maintenance and avoid branches, the identical component
> > should be merged and placed in the path belonging to the MDP
> > (from display/* to media/*).
>
> Combining bindings into one bigger meta-binding makes it usually more
> difficult to maintain and review.
Yeah, but these mediatek blocks appear to be used for both display and
video codec pipelines. So having different bindings was probably wrong
to start with.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists