[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpqgcOJHUFHtrTEE0T+jtQqdv3RGm-eTuVVa0ama_eFssQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:10:28 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Allow VDD_GFX supply to GX
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 09:03, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 05:51, Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > In some designs the SoC's VDD_GFX pads are supplied by an external
> > regulator, rather than a power-domain. Allow this to be described in the
> > GPU clock controller binding.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml
> > index f369fa34e00c..013ef78d2b31 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml
> > @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ properties:
> > power-domains:
> > maxItems: 1
> >
> > + vdd-gfx-supply:
> > + description: Regulator supply for the VDD_GFX pads
> > +
> > '#clock-cells':
> > const: 1
>
> I think it might be good to restrict this property to a particular
> platform (via if:not:properties:compatible:contains
> then:properties:vdd-gfx-supply:false).
After reading the last patches in the series, there is another
suggestion. Maybe we should explicitly say that there should be either
power-domains or vdd-gfx-supply, but not both.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists