linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/11] iio: adc: Add QCOM PMIC5 Gen3 ADC bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6b4ba9ab-7f5a-6733-5cd0-d0b8da80b3d1@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:31:08 +0530
From: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        <quic_subbaram@...cinc.com>, <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_kamalw@...cinc.com>, <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio
	<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
        <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] iio: adc: Add QCOM PMIC5 Gen3 ADC bindings

Hi Krzysztof

On 11/16/2023 5:16 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/11/2023 04:23, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 10/23/2023 12:06 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> You cannot remove constraints from an entry. 
>>
>> In this case, minItems: 1 will remain true for all other ADC devices
>> documented here, but it will not be true for ADC5 Gen3, as this one can
>> have multiple base addresses if more than one SDAM is used for ADC. I'll
>> update this separately for each compatible, keeping it the same for the
>> older ones, hope that should work.
> BTW, you disagree with me and send new version 2 minutes later.
> Basically you did not leave me any time to respond to you.
>
> That's not how the process works.


Sorry about this, I'll make sure not to repeat this.

Thanks,

Jishnu


>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>